Is AI eroding our critical thinking?

As AI has grown more commonplace in everyday life, psychologists theorize that it reduces users’ engagement in deep, reflective thinking, causing their critical thinking skills to atrophy over time. If individuals use the cognitive resources freed up by AI for innovative tasks, the promise holds. However, studies suggest that many users channel these resources into passive consumption, driven by AI-enhanced content curation. This trend aligns with findings on digital dependence, where the convenience of AI fosters a feedback loop that prioritizes entertainment over critical engagement. While it enhances efficiency and convenience, it inadvertently fosters dependence, which can compromise critical thinking skills over time. -Ross Pomeroy writing in BigThink

Going in Circles

When people get lost, they really do tend to walk in circles. German researchers discovered that volunteers who could not see the sun or moon often walked for hours in circles, sometimes in circles as small as 20 yards across. Some participants didn’t believe the researchers until they were shown proof.

What makes the difference are external signposts. Landmarks like the sun or moon completely changed the result.

One of the researchers offers this advice: “Don’t trust your senses. You might think you are walking in a straight line when you’re not.”

Isn’t that how life is? We know people who trust their senses and have no external guideposts to keep their lives on track. They believe they are marching forward, but all the while, they are going nowhere. They repeat the same mistakes. The people who get somewhere in life carefully choose their landmarks and trust these life-anchors.

Stephen Goforth

No one is completely immune

Psychological research shows that misinformation is cleverly designed to bypass careful analytical reasoning, meaning that it can easily slip under the radar of even the most intelligent and educated people. No one is completely immune. Indeed, there is now evidence that smarter people may sometimes be even more vulnerable to certain ideas, since their greater brainpower simply allows them to rationalise their (incorrect) beliefs. 

David Robson writing in The Guardian 

6 Webinars this Week about AI, Journalism & Media

Tue, April 1 - Website & Email Marketing

What: We guide you through the essentials of website and email marketing – the most direct online sales tools. Learn how to build an effective website that converts visitors into customers and create compelling email campaigns that drive engagement. Whether you’re just starting or looking to enhance your strategy, take your online presence to the next level.

When: 12 pm, Eastern

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: Small Business Development Center, Temple University

More Info

 

Tue, April 1 - Introduction to solutions journalism

What: This webinar will explore the basic principles and pillars of solutions journalism, talk about why it’s important, explain key steps in reporting a solutions story, and share tips and resources for journalists interested in investigating how people are responding to social problems.  

Who: Michael Davis, SJN's training & curriculum manager.

When: 6 pm, Eastern

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: Solutions Journalism

More Info

 

Wed, April 2 - Hitting the Mark

What: This webinar will help you target your message to distinct audiences, protect your brand’s reputation, maintain public trust and navigate challenges effectively.

When: 10 am, Eastern

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: C2 Strategic and Indiana GAL CASA

More Info

 

Wed, April 2 - Beyond the Basics of Science Reporting

What: This webinar is designed for reporters covering science either occasionally or full-time. It teaches basic principles about recognizing science worth reporting on and doing it justice in your coverage.

Who: Freelance science reporter Elena Renken and Ph.D. neuroscientist Dr. Tori Espensen

When: 2 pm, Eastern

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: Society of Environmental Journalists

More Info

 

Wed, April 2 - The Future Press: Testing AI in Journalism

What: This webinar will feature a presentation about an innovative project funded by the Dallas Morning News Innovation Endowment in which journalism students test the boundaries of AI in media production by utilizing tools such as ChatGPT, Bing AI, and Google Bard to generate content for a publication. The team maintains transparency throughout the process, openly discussing the use of AI and the editing required to refine AI-generated content for publication.

Who: Gracie Warhurst, UT alum and journalist Ryan Serpico; Hearst DevHub Angelica Ruzanova; UT student Jonathan Hopper; UT student Ashlyn Poole, UT student.

When: 4 pm, Eastern  

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: Online News Association

More Info

 

Wed, April 2 - “And Now, a Word From Our Sponsor”: The Early Days of TV Advertising

What: How advertising evolved during television’s first two decades and the important role it played in convincing viewers that the key to happiness was to buy their way into the American dream.

Who: Media historian Brian Rose

When: 6:30 pm

Where: Zoom

Cost: $25

Sponsor: The Smithsonian

More Info

 

Thu, April 3 - The Ethics of Nonprofit News: What Board Members and Donors Need to Know

What: Issues will include conflicts of interest and understanding the boundaries between the news and fundraising sides of a community journalism organization.

Who: Josh Stearns, managing director of programs at the Democracy Fund; Kara Meyberg Guzman, CEO and co-founder of Santa Clara Local, a nonprofit startup; Joe Kriesberg, publisher of CommonWealth Beacon.

When: 7 pm, Eastern

Where: Zoom

Cost: Free

Sponsor: The What Works project on the future of local news, part of Northeastern University’s School of Journalism

More Info

Why Humans are Better Storytellers Than AI

Literary agent Jamie Carr of the Book Group describes great storytelling as something that makes “connections between things and ideas that are totally nonsensical — which is something only humans can do.” Can ChatGPT bring together disparate parts of your life and use a summer job to illuminate a fraught friendship? Can it link a favorite song to an identity crisis? So far, nope. Crucially, ChatGPT can’t do one major thing that all my clients can: have a random thought. “I’m not sure why I’m telling you this” is something I love to hear from students, because it means I’m about to go on a wild ride that only the teenage brain can offer. It’s frequently in these tangents about collecting cologne or not paying it forward at the Starbucks drive-thru that we discover the key to the essay. I often describe my main task as helping students turn over stones they didn’t know existed, or stones they assumed were off-limits. ChatGPT can’t tap into the unpredictable because it can only turn over the precise stones you tell it to — and if you’re issuing these orders, chances are you already know what’s under the stone. 

Sanibel Chai writing in New York Magazine

Do I have Value?

To say a person has worth or value formulates only half a sentence. It begs two questions and raises a third: Worth what? To whom? Who says? These questions reveal a search for a source, a valuer, an authority behind the action of attaching worth. This quest implies our awareness of a person larger than us, who initiates relationships with us. Our parents stood as the original superhumans in whose eyes we wanted much worth. Now as adults, when we feel worthless, we ache with the dangling half-question. Do I have any value?  We used to seek evidence from Mom and Dad of our importance to them. Though we no longer look to them as our source, we have not yet identified a new one. We spin our wheels with the unanswered questions of our half-sentences. We wistfully yearn for some authority to come along and fill those gaps that our parents left.

Dennis Gibson, The Strong-Willed Adult

20 Articles about the Limitations of AI

"Humans in the loop" make AI work, for now - Axios

We were promised “Star Trek,” so why did we settle for these lousy chatbots? – Big Think

Having AI Mock Up An Old Game Is Not The Same As Preserving It – Tech Dirt  

"Humans in the loop" make AI work, for now - Axios 

AI is ‘beating’ humans at empathy and creativity. But these games are rigged – The Guardian 

The truth about DOGE’s AI plans: The tech can’t do that – Washington Post   

The Cultural Backlash Against Generative AI – Toward Data Science  

Why Do AI Chatbots Have Such a Hard Time Admitting ‘I Don’t Know’? – Wall Street Journal  

China has more trust in AI than the United States – Axios

AI can solve math olympiad problems but flunks tic-tac-toe – Stat Modeling

The Words That Stop ChatGPT in Its Tracks Why won’t the bot say my name? – The Atlantic 

7 ways gen AI can create more work than it saves – CIO

AI’s Trust Problem – MIT Tech Review

I'm the CEO of an AI company, and this is the BS behind AI – Fast Company 

Despite its impressive output, generative AI doesn’t have a coherent understanding of the world – MIT    

The Death of Search AI is transforming how billions navigate the web. A lot will be lost in the process.  – The Atlantic

ChatGPT outperforms undergrads in intro-level courses, falls short later – ArsTechnica  

AI polling company defends wrong predictions on the US election – Semafor

Detroit police falsely arrested woman after faulty facial recognition hit: lawsuit  - Detroit News

DOGE's "AI-first" strategy courts disaster - Axios

Conserve Your Willpower: It Runs Out

Ever wonder why your resolve to hit the gym weakens after you’ve slogged through a soul-sapping day at work? It’s because willpower isn’t just some storybook concept; it’s a measurable form of mental energy that runs out as you use it, much like the gas in your car.

Roy Baumeister, a psychologist at Florida State University, calls this “ego depletion,” and he proved its existence by sitting students next to a plate of fresh-baked chocolate-chip cookies. Some were allowed to snack away, others ordered to abstain. Afterward, both groups were asked to complete difficult puzzles. The students who’d been forced to resist the cookies had so depleted their reserves of self-control that when faced with this new task, they quickly threw in the towel. The cookie eaters, on the other hand, had conserved their willpower and worked on the puzzles longer.

But there are ways to wield what scientists know about willpower to our advantage. Since it’s a finite resource, don’t spread yourself thin: Make one resolution rather than many. And if you manage to stick with it by, say, not smoking for a week, give your willpower a rest by indulging in a nice dinner. Another tactic is to outsource self-control. Get a gym buddy. Use Mint.com to regulate your spending or RescueTime.com to avoid distracting websites.

As John Tierney, coauthor with Baumeister of Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength explains, “People with the best self-control aren’t the ones who use it all day long. They’re people who structure their lives so they conserve it.” That way, you’ll be able to stockpile vast reserves for when you really need it.

Judy Dunn, Wired Magazine

The AI Lens

Striving to create an AI strategy will likely force employees to look at everything through an AI lens. Right now, it seems like AI is seen as the solution, whatever the problem is.  But just because it’s getting all the attention today doesn’t mean that will continue. There will be other technologies that are coming downstream, and focusing too much on AI will crowd out other solutions to other problems a company might have. -Wall Street Journal

Memories are Overrated

A comment I heard from a member of the audience after a lecture illustrates the difficulty of distinguishing memories from experiences. He told of listening raptly to a long symphony on a disc that was scratched near the end, producing a shocking sound, and he reported that the bad ending “ruined the whole experience.” But the experience was not actually ruined, only the memory of it. The experience itself was almost entirely good, and the bad end could not undo it, because it had already happened. My questioner had assigned the entire episode a failing grade because it had ended very badly, but that grade effectively ignored 40 minutes of musical bliss. Does the actual experience count for nothing?

Confusing experience with the memory of it is a compelling cognitive illusion – and it is the substitution that makes us believe a past experience can be ruined. The experiencing self does not have a voice. The remembering self is sometimes wrong, but it is the one that keep score and governs what we learn from living, and it is the one that makes decisions. What we learn from the past is to maximize the qualities of our future memories, not necessarily of our future experience. This is the tyranny of the remembering self.

We have strong preferences about the duration of our experiences of pain and pleasure. We want pain to be brief and pleasure to last. But our memory (represents) the most intense moments of an episode of pain or pleasure and the feelings when the episode was at its end. A memory that neglects duration will not serve our preferences for long pleasure and short pains.

Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow