16 Articles about AI & Academic Scholarship
/Publishers are selling papers to train AIs — and making millions of dollars – Nature
Can AI fix the peer review bottleneck? Top journals weigh in - News-Medical.Net
Can Google Scholar survive the AI revolution? - Nature
Rethinking Reviewer Fatigue AI’s place in a broader discussion - EON
Writing assistant, workhorse, or accelerator? How academics are using GenAI – London School of Economics
Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means? – Nature
The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing – Science Direct
Can AI be used to assess research quality? – Nature
Scholarly Publishing World Slow to Embrace Generative AI – Inside Higher Education
National Academies President on How to Use Generative AI Responsibly in Scientific Research – JAMA
Study of ChatGPT citations makes dismal reading for publishers – Tech Crunch
Experts fail to reliably detect AI-generated histological data – Nature
AI-authored abstracts ‘more authentic’ than human-written ones – Times Higher Ed
AI’s computing gap: academics lack access to powerful chips needed for research – Nature
AI-generated survey responses could make research less accurate – and a lot less interesting – Stanford